You have to be signed in to use this resource.
Clinical excellence: evidence on the assessment of senior doctors' applications to the UK Advisory Committee on Clinical Excellence Awards. Analysis of complete national data set
Extract from abstract:
Objectives
To inform the rational deployment of assessor resource in the evaluation of applications to the UK Advisory Committee on Clinical Excellence Awards (ACCEA).
Conclusions
Assessment processes pertaining in the competitive allocation of public funds need to be credible and efficient. The present arrangements for assessing and scoring applications are defensible, depending on the level of reliability judged to be required in the assessment process. Some relatively minor reconfiguration in approaches to scoring might usefully be considered in future rounds of assessment.
This article is open access.
Additional information
Published: June, 2016. Journal Article.
Resource details
| Contributed by: | WE-R NHS (Workforce and Education Research NHS) |
| Authored by: |
|
| Licence: | More information on licences |
| Last updated: | 30 April 2024 |
| First contributed: | 02 August 2023 |
| Audience access level: | General user |
Share this resource
Report an issue with this resource
You may report a resource, for example, if there is an issue with copyright infringement, breach of personal data, factual inaccuracies, typing errors or safety concerns. The type of issue will determine whether the resource is immediately removed from the platform or if the contributor is asked to make amendments. You can report a resource from the resource information page or by contacting the Learning Hub support team.
You can contact the Learning Hub support team by completing the support form or if you have a general enquiry you can email enquiries@learninghub.nhs.uk.